簡介：華中科技大學碩士學位論文國家經營性財產所有權行使論姓名林紅平申請學位級別碩士專業民商法學指導教師裴麗萍20090516華中科技大學碩士學位論華中科技大學碩士學位論華中科技大學碩士學位論華中科技大學碩士學位論文文文文IIABSTRACTABSTRACTABSTRACTABSTRACTASTHECOREOFTHEREALRIGHTS,OWNERSHIPISONEOFTHEPRIVATERIGHTS,HASTHECHARACTEROFTRANSACTIONSTATEOWNERSHIPISTHATTHECOUNTRYASTHECIVILSUBJECTISENTITLEDTOPOSSESS,UTILIZE,SEEKPROFITSFROMANDDISPOSEOFTHERIGHTSONITSPROPERTYCOUNTRYHASDUALLEGALPERSONALITYANDINOURCOUNTRYTHEPRODUCTIONMATERIALBELONGSTOTHEWHOLEPEOPLESOINTHEACADEMIC,THESTATEOWNERSHIPSNATURE,SUBJECTANDOBJECTTHATEXISTGREATDISPUTESTHEDIFFERENTOPINIONSALSOEXISTINTHECURRENTLAWSUCHASTHE“CONSTITUTIONLAW“,“PROPERTYLAW“ANDTHE“ENTERPRISESTATEOWNEDASSETSLAW“,ALLHAVETHERULESTHATTHESTATEPROPERTYBELONGSTOTHECOUNTRYANDALSOBELONGSTOTHEWHOLEPEOPLEACCORDINGTOPROPERTYLAW,STATEOWNERSHIPANDTHEGENERALOWNERSHIPAREPROTECTEDEQUALLYINORDERTODEFINETHESTATEOWNERSHIPSNATURE,SUBJECTANDOBJECTCLEARLY,WESHOULDSTARTWITHSTUDYINGTHEGENERALOWNERSHIPTHEPRIVATELAWTELLSUSTHATOWNERSHIPISAPRIVATERIGHT,NOTPOWERUNLESSTHELAWCLEARLYDEFINEDTHATRIGHTCANBETHEOBJECTOFTHEOWNERSHIP,DEITYTHINGISTHEOWNERSHIPSONLYOBJECTOWNERSHIPSSUBJECTMUSTBEAFFIRMATIVESTATEOWNERSHIPALSOHAVETHECHARACTERCOUNTRYCANBEAPRIVATECORPORATEAND“THEWHOLEPEOPLE“CANTBEAFFIRMATIVEDECIDETHATCOUNTRYISTHESTATEOWNERSHIPSREALSUBJECTPEOPLEARETHEMASTERSOFTHECOUNTRYTHEWHOLEPEOPLEENJOY“ECONOMICPOWER“ONTHEINTERESTBYSTATEOWNERSHIPTHEREALIZATIONOFSTATEOWNERSHIPMUSTDEPENDONTHEEXERTIONTHEEXERTIONOFTHESTATEOPERATINGOWNERSHIPISTHEBODYOFTHEEXERTIONCHOOSINGTHEWAYSOFRIGHTSEXERTIONISTHERESULTOFTHEGAMEBETWEENEFFICIENCYANDFAIRNESS,THEEXERTIONOFSTATEOPERATIONOWNERSHIPALSOFOLLOWTHISRULETHESTATEOWNEDENTERPRISEMANAGEMENTMODESMAYBEDIFFERENTINDIFFERENTCOUNTRIES,BUTALLIMPLEMENTINGTHECONCEPTOFDECENTRALIZEDMANAGEMENT,MEETINGTHENEEDSOFEFFICIENCYANDFAIRNESSINTHECURRENT,CHINESEEXERTIONMODEOFTHEOPERATIONOWNERSHIPLACKOFASTRATEGICRESTRUCTURINGSYSTEMOFTHESTATEPROPERTYMANAGEMENTTHISIMPORTANTPOWERSHOULDBEGIVENTOTHEPEOPLESCONGRESSANDITSCOMMITTEESUNDERTHEPREMISETHATTHESTATEOWNEDENTERPRISESHAVETHERIGHTTOMAKETHEIROWNDECISIONS,THEGOVERNMENTANDITSSTATEOWNEDASSETMANAGEMENTCOMPANIESARERESPONSIBLEFORSPECIFICMANAGEMENT,THEPEOPLESCONGRESSISASUPERVISORSOWECANBUILDADUALEXERTIONMODELITMEETTHECURRENTSOCIAL

簡介：華中科技大學碩士學位論文凝視的力量?？路ㄕ軐W思想研究姓名魏宇申請學位級別碩士專業法學理論指導教師齊海濱20090517華中科技大學碩士學位論文華中科技大學碩士學位論文IIABSTRACTFRENCHTHINKERMICHELFOUCAULTSTHEYCANBEDESCRIBEDASUNIQUEINTHETWENTIETHCENTURYHEHASINHERITEDTHENIETZSCHESGENEALOGYMETHODSUSEITSDISTINCTIVEPERSPECTIVEINPURPOSETOEXCAVATEOFWHICHWDSWEREBURIEDTOMAKEADECONSTRUCTIONONTHETWOSPECIALPLACESALUNATICASYLUMPRISONBASEDONTHISHEFMSHISOWNTHEYONTHEOPERATIONMODEOFSOCIETYWHICHDIFFERENTFROMTHOSEOFOTHERSTHENAPOWERSTRUCTUREWASESTABLISHEDBYTHE“GAZE”AUNIQUEAPPROACHSTEMFROMDEEPRESEARCHINGOFTHEMATERIALOFTWOSPECIALPLACESAFTERTHATFOUCAULTMAKEAHIGHLYABSTRACTOFTHESEMATERIALINTEGRATETHECOMMUNITYASAWHOLETHENCONSTITUTEHISPHILOSOPHYWHICHDIFFERENTFROMTHEMAINSTREAMTHEYTHEROLEOF“GAZE“ISTWOFOLDONTHEONEHISTHESTRUCTUREOFPOWERRELATIONSONTHEOTHERHITCANSEEMASACERTAINSOCIETYIMPETUSTHEREHASACERTAINRELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHEMAFTERTHEFMATIONOFTHEPOWERRELATIONSTHEWHOLECOMMUNITYHASBEENLINKEDMAKINGTHEDISTRIBUTIONOFPOWERLIKEMESHSTRUCTUREEACHPOINTOFTHECOMMUNITYINTERRELATEDWHILECONSTRAINTSWHICHCONSTITUTEANINDISPENSABLEPARTOFCOMMUNITYASARESULTOFTHISRELATIONSHIPBASEDONEACHPOINTOFSOCIETYSOWNNEEDSTHERULINGCLASSSCONTROLTHISBECOMESANIMPETUSTOSOCIALDEVELOPMENTOBVIOUSLYALTHOUGHTHEDEIONWASNOTEASYTOACCEPTFOUCAULTSALTERNATIVEDEIONPOINTOUTTHEPATHOFDEVELOPMENTTHISCANBESEENDIALECTICALLYAPPLIESTOTHESTUDYOFLAWFIRSTOFALLINTHISPAPERTHEIGINOFFOUCAULT’STHEYISANALYZEDTHENTHE“GAZE“ASTHEBREAKTHROUGHPOINTTOINTRODUCETHETWOASPECTSOFITSFUNCTIONFINALLYDISCUSSTHEPRACTICALSIGNIFICANCEONTHECONSTRUCTIONOFHARMONIOUSSOCIETYINCHINABYFOUCAULT’STHEYKEYWDSGAZEPOWERPOWERRELATIONSDRIVINGFCE

簡介：行政聽證是新世紀社會民主化的發展品，其在英國的奠基是自然公正原則，在美國的奠基是正當性原則和程序性原則，而我國則主要體現在依照法律管理行政原則。在行政聽證制度蘊涵的所有價值中，人們往往只重視公民實質性權利，而忽視聽證程序平衡公正，高效節約的價值。我國的行政處罰聽證程序是行政聽證制度的重要組成部分，對其進一步的探討研究有利于行政聽證制度的全面發展。行政處罰聽證程序是指行政機關在對相對人作出重大懲罰前，賦予其說明申辯權，然后依核實確認的資料判定的一種程序。我國行政處罰法初次以法條明文確認了行政處罰聽證程序，這是我國依照法定規制行政的一個方向標。多年實踐已充分證明，聽證可以增強當事人說明申辯權的發揮，協助行政機關降低錯判度，有力體現出懲治教育結合。但我國聽證程序不夠細化，致使實踐中產生許多條文理解上的爭議，加之有的行政機關法律思維局限大或高專精人才斷檔，演變成聽證形式主義，處罰產生信譽危機。為了使我國的行政處罰聽證制度能夠更好的適應社會主義市場經濟運行的需求，必須要進一步完善其具體程序。本文將從行政處罰聽證程序的必要性、中外行政處罰聽證程序部分規定比較、我國行政處罰聽證程序的缺陷及原因分析和我國行政處罰聽證程序的完善四個方面進行論述。

簡介：華中科技大學碩士學位論文司法能動與接近正義以糾紛解決、權利創設為視角姓名徐濤申請學位級別碩士專業經濟法指導教師齊海濱20090501華中科技大學碩士學位論文華中科技大學碩士學位論文IIABSTRACTTHEREAREABOUT60000WDSINTHETEXTINADDITIONTOTHEINTRODUCTIONCONCLUSIONTHEPAPERISDIVIDEDINTOFOURCHAPTERSFROMTHELEVELCANBESEENASTWOLEVELSTHEFIRSTTIERJUDICIALACTIVISMINTHEJUDICIALREVIEWISTHETRADITIONALVISIONSOFJUDICIALACTIVISMTRADITIONALLYDEFINEDASAPHILOSOPHYWHICHMOTIVATESJUDGESTODEPARTFROMSTRICTADHERENCETOJUDICIALPRECEDENTINFAVOFPROGRESSIVENEWSOCIALPOLICIESTHECAUSESOFJUDICIALWAYWARDNESSDERIVEFROMHAVEPRODUCEDRELATEDPROBLEMSINTHEOTHERTWOBRANCHESINDEEDADISTTIONOFOURWHOLEFABRICOFCONSTITUTIONALGOVERNMENTINDERTORESTETRUECONSTITUTIONALGOVERNMENTWEMUSTLOOKNOTONLYTOJUDICIALACTIVISMBUTTOTHOSERELATEDPROBLEMSINTHEEXECUTIVELEGISLATURETHEIDEOLOGICALFLIPOFTHEJUDICIALACTIVISTHASREVEALEDTHEPOSSIBLEWEAKNESSOFRELIANCEONACTIVISMINTHECONTEXTOFAPOLITICOIDEOLOGICALARGUMENTANALYSISOFTHEJUDICIALEXERCISEITSROLECOULDONLYBENEFITFROMTHERECOGNITIONOFAVARIETYOFMEANINGSEXPRESSIONSOFACTIVISMEACHOFWHICHSHOULDBESEPARATELYASSESSEDWESHOULDBUILDAMULTILAYEREDMODELOFACTIVISMRECOGNIZETHEOTHERFACEOFJUDICIALACTIVISMTHESECONDLAYERJUDICIALACTIVISMINLAWSUITSISTHEINNOVATIONOFTHISPAPERMANAGERIALJUDGINGJUDICIALCREATIONRIGHTSARETHEMOSTPROMINENTPERFMANCEOFJUDICIALACTIVISMJUDICIALACTIVISMISTHEACTUALNEEDOFJUSTICETHISPROCESSCOULDHOPEFULLYENDFURTHERRELIANCEONACTIVISMFPARTISANPURPOSESRESERVETHEFIELDFREASONEDANALYSESOFTHEROLEOFTHEJUDICIARYINTHISPAPERTHEREARETWOINNOVATIONSFIRSTTHEAUTHMAKESACOMPREHENSIVESYSTEMATICCOMPREHENSIVEACTIVISMFROMTHETWODIVERSIONSOFJUDICIALREVIEWLAWSUITSSUCHDIVERSIFICATIONPERSPECTIVEINTHEPREVIOUSSTUDIESISNOTOFTENTOSEESECONDTHEARTICLEREALIZESTHEINTEGRATIONOFJUDICIALACTIVISMCHINASJUDICIALREALITIESTHEFUTUREBASEDONCHINASPRACTICETHEAUTHADVOCATESTHEJUDICIALACTIVISMINLAWSUITSMANAGERIALJUDGINGJUDICIALCREATIONRIGHTSARETHEMOSTPROMINENTPERFMANCEOFJUDICIALACTIVISMINLAWSUITSINDERTOPROVIDENEWIDEASFCHINASJUDICIALREFMINTHEFUTUREKEYWDSJUDICIALACTIVISMMANAGERIALJUDGINGJUDICIALCREATIONRIGHTS

簡介：華中科技大學碩士學位論文行政訴訟調解制度之探析姓名馬凱申請學位級別碩士專業法學理論指導教師吳毅20090501華中科技大學碩士學位論文華中科技大學碩士學位論文IIABSTRACTADMINISTRATIVELAWWHICHHASGONETHROUGHMANYHUNDREDSOFYEARSWASBNINFRANCETHATCANNOTCOMPARETOCIVILLAWCRIMINALLAWWHICHHAVETHOUSSOFYEARSOFHISTYBUTWITHTHEDEVELOPMENTOFDEMOCRACYHUMANRIGHTSTHEADMINISTRATIVELAWBECOMESASIGNIFICANTLEARNINGISRELATEDTOOURLIVESDEMOCRACYTHERULEOFLAWHAVEBECAMETHEUNIVERSALVALUESATTHISBACKGROUNDTHEDEMOFMODERNADMINISTRATIVELAWFMTHECITIZENSISGROWINGADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONLAWOFCHINAPUBLICIN1989PROMOTEDTHEPROCESSOFDEMOCRACYHELPEDUSTOESTABLISHEDMARKETECONOMYSYSTEMINRECENTYEARSHOWEVERWITHTHEDEVELOPMENTOFJUDICIALPRACTICESOMELEGALPROVISIONSOFADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONLAWSUCHASNO51OFCHINESEADMINISTRATIVELAWSAYSTHATMEDIATIONISNOTSUITABLEINADMINISTRATIVECASESACCDINGTOTHISITFBIDSMEDIATIONINADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONINOURCOUNTRYWHICHCOURSESMANYEXPERTSSCHOLARSQUESTIONTHEDIFFERENCEBETWEENTHEETICALPRACTICALMAKESTHEAPPLICATIONOFMEDIATIONINADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONBECOMINGAHOTTOPICFROMTHECONCEPTOFSTUDYABROADTAIWANASWELLASTHEDIFFICULTYOFOURREALITYIWANTTOSEEKABREAKTHROUGHWAYATTHEBASEOFTHEETICALINVESTIGATIONCOSTOFLITIGATIONWHENWEWANTTOMENDTHEADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONLAWOFCHINATHUSIWANTTOGIVESOMESUGGESTIONSTOHELPBUILDINGTHEMEDIATIONSYSTEMINTHEADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONLAWOFCHINATHISPAPERISDIVIDEDINTOFOURPARTSTODEMONSTRATEMEDIATIONTHEFIRSTPARTFROMTHE“MEDIATION“OFTHECONCEPTIWILLDEFINETHECONCEPTTHENATUREOFMEDIATIONINADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONLAWASWELLASINTRODUCINGTHECONCEPTOFMEDIATIONTHERELEVANTCOMPARISONTHESECONDPARTFROMACOMPARATIVEPERSPECTIVE，IWANTTOPRESENTLEGISLATIVEEXPERIENCERELATEDTOTHESYSTEMPRACTICEEFFECTSOFUNITEDSTATESFRANCEGERMANYTAIWANITWILLPROVIDEAREFERENCEINDERTOHELPUSTOBUILDOURCOUNTRYSSYSTEMOFADMINISTRATIVELITIGATIONMEDIATION

簡介：煙臺大學碩士學位論文空間碎片的法律規制問題研究姓名關燕申請學位級別碩士專業國際法學指導教師樊靜20100312煙臺大學碩士學位論文煙臺大學碩士學位論文IIABSTRACTINRECENTYEARSASHUMANACTIVITIESINOUTERSPACEHAVEBECOMEINCREASINGLYFREQUENTTHENUMBERISPROLIFERATIONOFSPACEDEBRISSPACEDEBRISHASBECOMEAMAJSOURCEOFPOLLUTIONOFOUTERSPACESOTHEINTERNATIONALCOMMUNITYSATTENTIONATPRESENTTHEREGULATIONOFACTIVITIESINOUTERSPACEISTHEMAJLEGALDEVELOPMENTOFTHEFIVEUNITEDNATIONSOUTERSPACETREATYBUTITSAFEWOUTERSPACETREATIESREGULATINGTHEISSUEOFSPACEDEBRISREVEALSSERIOUSFLAWSSHTCOMINGSTHEREFEHOWTOBUILDEFFECTIVEEFFICIENTLEGALSYSTEMSPACEDEBRISTHENEEDFFURTHERSTUDYDISCUSSIONTHISPAPERISDIVIDEDINTOTHREECHAPTERSMETHAN30000WDSCHAPTERⅠOUTLINESTHEMAINPROBLEMSHAZARDSOFSPACEDEBRISTHROUGHANOVERVIEWOFSPACEDEBRISINTRODUCINGTHEINTERNATIONALCOMMUNITYTODEFINETHEMEANINGOFSPACEDEBRISSPACEDEBRISSOURCESTHEIRCLASSIFICATIONEXPLETHESPACEDEBRISCHAPTERIILOOKSATTHEEXISTINGLAWRELATINGTOSPACEDEBRISREGULATIONFIRSTOFALLINDEPTHANALYSISOFEXISTINGSPACEDEBRISWITHTHERELEVANTINTERNATIONALLEGALSYSTEMFOLLOWEDBYDETAILSONTHEMAJSPACEPOWERSTHEUNITEDSTATESRUSSIACHINASDOMESTICRELEVANTLEGISLATIONTHECONDUCTINDEPTHCHAPTERIIIPRESENTSTHEEXISTINGLAWRELATINGTOSPACEDEBRISREGULATYSHTCOMINGSIMPROVETHEPROPOSALFIRSTTHEINDUCTIONOFEXISTINGSPACEDEBRISTHESHTCOMINGSOFLEGALREGULATIONINTERNATIONALLAWLEVELINCLUDINGTHERELEVANTPROVISIONSOFTHEEXISTINGOUTERSPACETREATYLACKOFIDENTITYCANNOTBERECOGNIZEDBYSPACEDEBRISDAMAGELIABILITYCOMPENSATIONMECHANISMSFLOSSOFTHEMAINVACANCYLEVELOFDOMESTICLAWINCLUDINGINTERNATIONALTREATIESINTODOMESTICLAWTHEWKNEEDTOBESTRENGTHENEDONTHEPREVENTIONCONTROLOFSPACEDEBRISHASNOTYETFMEDANINDEPENDENTLEGALSPACEDEBRISSTILLNEEDTOCLEARLYDEFINEDACCOUNTABILITYTHENACOMPLETESETOFRECOMMENDATIONSINCLUDINGSETTINGSPECIALIZEDINTERNATIONALCONVENTIONSTHEESTABLISHMENTOFSPECIALIZEDINTERNATIONALGANIZATIONSASWELLASASOUNDCOMPLETELIABILITYMECHANISMSKEYWDSSPACEDEBRISSPACEENVIRONMENTDAMAGEOUTERSPACEINTERNATIONALLEGALREGULATION

簡介：華中科技大學碩士學位論文專利產品的修理、再造與專利侵權法律問題研究姓名屈繼偉申請學位級別碩士專業民商法學指導教師李揚20090517華華華華中中中中科科科科技技技技大大大大學學學學碩碩碩碩士士士士學學學學位位位位論論論論文文文文IIABSTRACTABSTRACTABSTRACTABSTRACTTHISPAPERISSTARTEDFROMINTRODUCINGTHECONCEPTOF“REPAIR““RECONSTRUCTION“OFPATENTEDPRODUCTSINPARTTWOITWILLBEANALYZEDSIXTYPICALCASESHAPPENEDINFEIGNCOUNTRIESTHENPROPOSEDTHREEQUESTIONSHOWTODETERMINETHEBOUNDARIESBETWEEN“REPAIR““RECONSTRUCTION“ПWHETHER“RECONSTRUCTION“WILLCERTAINLYCAUSEADIRECTINFRINGEMENTШINWHICHSITUATIONTHEBEHAVIOFREPAIRINGREPLACINGPARTSFTHEOWNEROFPATENTWILLCAUSETHECONTRIBUTYINFRINGEMENTTHISPAPERTALKEDABOUTTHETHREEQUESTIONSWHICHAREABOVEMENTIONEDFINALLYITGAVETHEPRELIMINARYCONCLUSIONSFIRSTLYTHECLAIMSOFPATENTTHEPROPERTYOFPRODUCTSTHECONSUMER’SHABITSOFUSINGTHEEXTENTOF“REPAIR“THECONSUMPTIONCANBEUSEDTODISTINGUISH“REPAIR““RECONSTRUCTION“ONLYINTHISCASEWHICHTHEPATENTPRODUCTSHAVEBEENREPAIREDREPLACEDARESTILLINTHEAREAOFPATENTCLAIMSTHATCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“RECONSTRUCTION“WHENTHEPRODUCTISCONSIDEREDASSCRAPPEDACCDINGTOITSPROPERTIESREPAIRITCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“RECONSTRUCTION“WHILETHEPRODUCTLOSTITSFUNCTIONIFCONSUMERNOLONGERUSEITREPAIRITCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“RECONSTRUCTION“IFTHEEXTENTOFREPAIRTHECONSUMPTIONISABOUTEQUALTOMAKEANEWPRODUCTTHEACTIONCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“RECONSTRUCTION“TOOOTHERWISEITCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“REPAIR“SECONDLYITNEEDSTOSTRIKEABALANCEAMONGALLPARTIESTODETERMINETHE“RECONSTRUCTION“ACTIONWILLCAUSETHEDIRECTINFRINGEMENTNOTWHILEAPATENTISCONSIDEREDASSCRAPPEDACCDINGTOTHECONSUMER’SHABITSOFUSINGRECYCLINGSHOULDN’TBECONSIDEREDASINFRINGEMENTBUTITSHOULDBECONSIDEREDASDIRECTINFRINGEMENTWHENTHEPATENTISSCRAPPEDACCDINGTOTHEPROPERTYOFPRODUCTSTHEEXTENTOF“REPAIR“THECONSUMPTIONBECAUSETHERECYCLINGISNOTUSEFULFPROTECTINGTHEENVIRONMENTECONOMIZINGONRESOURCESTOPROTECTTHEINTERESTSOFPATENTEEITCANBEIDENTIFIEDAS“RECONSTRUCTION“THIRDLYTOJUDGETHEMANUFACTURERSPROVIDINGREPLACEMENTPARTSSERVICEFCONSUMERWILLCAUSECONTRIBUTYINFRINGEMENTNOTWECANTHINKABOUT“WHETHERIT’SAGENERALMERCHISEHASSUBSTANTIALNONINFRINGINGUSES”“WHETHERIT’SASUBSTANTIALPARTOFTHEPATENT”KEYKEYKEYKEYWDSWDSWDSWDSREPAIRRECONSTRUCTIONCONTRIBUTYINFRINGEMENTCIRCULARECONOMY

簡介：煙臺大學碩士學位論文醫療費用保險理賠機制理論問題研究姓名張弛申請學位級別碩士專業民商法學指導教師史衛進20100312IIABSTRACTCHINASNEWLYREVISED“INSURANCELAW”STILLINSISTONTHEMARXISTLAWTHAT“ONEDIVIDESINTOTWO”REPRESENTEDBY“PROPERTYINSURANCE”“PERSONALINSURANCE”THISCLASSIFICATIONNEGLECTSTHESPECIFICITYOFHEALTHINSURANCEACCIDENTINSURANCE，WHICHISTHATTHEYHAVEBOTHTHENATUREOFFIXEDSUMINSURANCEINDEMNITYINSURANCETHEYCONSTITUTEASPECIALTYPEOFINSURANCEESPECIALLYFTHEMEDICALEXPENSEINSURANCEWHICHISBELONGSTOTHISTYPEOFINSURANCEALTHOUGHITISAKINDOFTHEPERSONALINSURANCEITHASTHENATUREOFPROPERTYINSURANCEJUSTBECAUSEITUNDERWRITETHESPECIFICMEDICALEXPENSECHINASINSURANCELAWDOESNOTSEETHESPECIALNATUREOFSUCHINSURANCEINTHEARTICLE2OF“INSURANCELAW”“PAYMENTOFINDEMNITIES”ISCRESPONDEDTO“PROPERTYLOSSES”“PAYMENTOFINSURANCEBENEFITS”ISCRESPONDEDTO“THEDEATHINJURYDISABILITYILLNESSOFTHEINSUREDCONDITIONSSUCHASAGETERMSPECIFIEDINTHECONTRACT”WHICHESSENTIALLYSETSUPTHECLAIMADJUSTMENTMECHANISMOF“COMPENSATIONRULESAPPLICATEDTOPROPERTYINSURANCEPAYMENTRULESAPPLICATEDTOPERSONALINSURANCE”FTHEMEDICALEXPENSESINSURANCEONBEHALFOFSUCHHEALTHINSURANCEACCIDENTINSURANCEWHETHERTHEYARECOMPENSATYWHETHERWESHOULDUSESUBGATIONTHERULESOFDOUBLEINSURANCEWHATCLAIMADJUSTMENTMECHANISMSHOULDWECHOOSEACADEMICSPRACTITIONERSONTHESEISSUESISQUITECONTROVERSIALINSURERSTHEINSUREDALSOHOLDDIFFERENTVIEWSONTHISPROBLEMWHICHHASCAUSEDMANYPROBLEMSINTHEJUDICIALPRACTICETHEINSURANCEPRACTICEIFWEDON’TMAKETHESEPROBLEMSCLEARITISHARMFULTOTHEDEVELOPMENTOFCHINASINSURANCEINDUSTRYITISNOTCONDUCIVETOTHEINSUREDTHEBENEFICIARYOFTHEPROTECTIONOFLEGITIMATERIGHTSINTERESTSASWELLASTHEMAINTENANCEOFCHINASJUDICIALSERIOUSNESSBESIDESTHEPREFACECONCLUSIONTHEREAREFOURPARTSINTHISPAPERTHEFIRSTPARTTRIESTODEFINETHECONNOTATIONEXTENSIONOF“MEDICALEXPENSESINSURANCE”CLARIFIESTHESTATUSOFTHECLAIMADJUSTMENTMECHANISMTHESIGNIFICANCEOFTHESTUDYOFTHISMECHANISMABOVETHESECONDPARTISABOUTTHESCOPEOFAPPLICATIONOFTHEINDEMNITY

簡介：煙臺大學碩士學位論文論我國刑法中的致人死亡姓名劉靜申請學位級別碩士專業刑法學指導教師初炳東20080331IIABSTRACTABOUTTHE“CAUSINGDEATH“ALMOSTALLCOUNTRIESINTHECRIMINALLAWHAVETHERELATEDLEGISLATIONTOSTIPULATEBUTDUETOTHEDIFFERENCESINLEGALCULTURALTRADITIONSTHEETICALRESEARCHTHERESPECTIVESTIPULATIONALSOHASTHEVARIOUSDIFFERENCESLOOKINGFROMTHETHEETICALSTUDYOFTHEDEVELOPMENTTRENDTHECURRENTRESEARCHOFMYCOUNTRYON“CAUSINGDEATH“STILLHASTHEFAULTOFNOTENOUGHCOMPREHENSIVEONLYONSOMECRIMEINCIRMINALLAWMINUTERARESYSTEMDISCUSSEDFTHESAMEOFFENCE“CAUSINGDEATH“THEREARESTILLMANYDIFFERENTUNDERSTINGSVIEWSINTHEEDUCATIONALWLDRESULTINGINALOTOFDOCTRINALDISPUTESTHECONFUSIONSINJUDICIARYAPPLYINVIEWOFTHISTHEARTICLESENDSTODOASYSTEMELABATIONONTHE“CAUSINGDEATH“OFOURCRIMINALLAWINDERTOMAKETHEACADEMICCIRCLETHEPRACTICALSREALMTOTHISQUESTIONSATTENTIONTHEDISCUSSIONTHENENRICHOURCOUNTRYSCRIMINALLAWTHEYCONSUMMATEOURCOUNTRYSLEGISLATIONON“CAUSINGDEATH“EXCEPTTHEINTRODUCTIONCONCLUSIONTHEREARETHREEPARTSABOUT33000WDSTHEFIRSTPARTACADEMICALLYANALYZESALLTYPESOF“CAUSINGDEATH“INTHECRIMINALLAWOFCHINAFIRSTLYTHEAUTHSUMMARIZESALLKINDSOFLEGISLATIONPHENOMENONINCURRENTCRIMINALLAWOFCHINATRYINGTOREPLACETHOSEAMBIGOUSWDSINTHECRIMINALLAWOF1979THELEGISLATIVESTIPULATIONOFTHE“CAUSINGDEATH“INTHENEWCRIMINALLAWISOFCRIMINALJURISPRUDENCEVALUESECONDLYTHE

簡介：博士學位論文美國美國法院附設仲裁研究法院附設仲裁研究ONAMERICANCOURTANNEXEDARBITRATION作者姓名王春麗1指導教師汪祖興研究員1西南政法大學SOUTHWESTUNIVERSITYOFPOLITICALSCIENCELAW1內容摘要多元文化的融合與沖突既是美國的文化特征，亦是美國人接受多元解紛方式的社會條件。法院附設仲裁是美國在法院系統內創設的第一個ADR，并被譽為“司法ADR之父”。它是一種與傳統仲裁迥然相異的糾紛解決機制，其發端于法院、運行于法院，且在訴訟的蔭影下致力于糾紛的解決。法院附設仲裁的獨特魅力在于其裁決不具約束力與終局性，卻彰顯了司法的公信力；其顛覆了人們對仲裁的傳統認知卻并非對傳統仲裁之否定。法院附設仲裁不僅拓寬了仲裁的適用場域，還以其“莊嚴的非正式性”增加了“接近司法”的路徑。本文除導論外，共分五個章節，主要內容為第一章是法院附設仲裁歷史嬗變。訴訟與ADR的互動締造了法院附設仲裁，龐德會議則為其提供了蓬勃發展的契機。在聯邦立法方面，迄今為止最重要的建樹為1998年替代性糾紛解決法；在實踐方面，法院附設仲裁走過了三個發展階段第一階段是19701980年代，美國聯邦法院首次試點附設仲裁；第二階段是19902000年代，法院附設仲裁已發展成為法院案件管理實踐的既定部分；第三階段是2000年至今，附設仲裁成為廣泛用于聯邦和州級初審法院系統的替代性糾紛解決機制。第二章是美國法院附設仲裁學理分析。法院附設仲裁乃美國司法實用主義的智慧之作。實用主義司法乃法律實用主義的核心，其強調司法要關心后果，以及基于后果作出政策判斷的傾向。實用主義法律進路對糾紛解決理論產生了深刻影響。將仲裁機制運用于法院管理中，既可節約法院資源，又能于法院語境下分流案件、消解糾紛，以上亦是仲裁附設于法院的因由。法院附設仲裁誕生后，諸多爭議亦隨之而起，諸如應否阻抑重新審判、應否舍棄仲裁之終局性內核、會否輸出“次等正義”，批評者對其正當性提出質疑，卻也間接推動了法院附設仲裁的發展。第三章是美國法院附設仲裁運作規程。聯邦地區法院和州級初審法院之所以得以建立和實施法院附設仲裁，是源于ADR法所賦予的權力或固有授權。法院附設仲裁程序依開啟、展開和結束三個階段漸次鋪開，這是仲裁運作的動態過程。自愿性與強制性仲裁是美國法院附設仲裁的兩種模式，自愿性仲裁模式包括“選擇進入”與“選擇退出”型模式，強制性仲裁模式又分為“強制進入”與“法官下令進入”。通過本

簡介：我國證券市場起步較晚幾乎未經歷證券非移動化的階段直接在20世紀90年代初期滬深證券交易所基本實現證券的無紙化發行和流通。但因為轉變過快大部分的市場參與主體如投資者、證券公司并不清楚無紙化證券與傳統紙質證券有何區別。2005年新修訂的中華人民共和國證券法中關于無紙化證券只有少數原則性規定2006年生效的證券登記結算管理辦法中對證券賬戶、證券存管的規定是為了完善登記結算制度。但關于無紙化證券的基本問題如無紙化證券的權利屬性、無紙化證券的交易生效要件、市場參與主體之間的法律關系、投資者保護等現有法律和部門規章對此并無明確規定。本文通過對德國、日本、美國的相關立法以及羅馬統一私法協會制定的關于中介化證券的實體法公約的比較研究結合我國目前證券市場的透明持有結構構建以投資人證券賬戶為出發點的以權利本身股權、債權為客體的“準物權”權利體系用“準物權”理論解釋證券無紙化后的權利歸屬問題并引入優先權、善意取得、損失分擔等制度來保護投資者最后建議通過專門立法為無紙化證券交易流通提供確定性。

簡介：R一、萋意，謄I羲毒_J≮萎一萎霧毒薯磊，霧豪’、毒。疊；美婁謄“I一三孑JO二毋IJ；親’_主‘，T二IF’二；T≯≮_JO～，，爹L磐濺凳茹寡一，擎起搭Ⅳ≯～RURALELITEGOⅦRNANCERESEARCH_BASEDONⅥLLAGERS’SELFGOVERNANCEFORMPERSPECTIVEPRESENTEDBYHUANGBODISSERTATIONSUBMITTEDTONANJINGAGRICULTURALUNIVERSITYINPARTIALFULFILLMENTOFTHEREQUIREMENTSFORTHEDOCTORDEGREEOFPUBLICADMINISTRATIONSUPERVISEDBYPROFESSORLIUZUYUNCOLLEGEOFPUBLICADMINISTRATIONNANJINGAGRICULTURALUNIVERSITYNANJING，CHINAJUNE，2013

簡介：分類號密級訓Q≮單位代碼10422學號刪刪川㈣㈣．ILLJ『JJJTLIL?RLLII|I『FIJJ11FY3408602”博士學位論文DISSERTATIONFORDOCTORALDEGREE論文題目年月日夕尋吖六娜簍眥／O蜘／∥吾|⑧名位稱師師姓單名教導者養業導作作培專指合ORIGINALITYSTATEMENTIHEREBYSOLEMNLYDECLARETHATTHEDISSERTATIONSUBMITTEDBYMEISORIGINALANDISTHERESULTOFINDEPENDENTRESEARCHCONDUCTEDUNDERTHEGUIDANCEOFMYSUPERVISOR．THISDISSERTATIONDOESNOTCONTAINANYRESEARCHRESULTSORDISCUSSIONTHATHAVEBEENPUBLISHEDORWRITTENBYOTHERINDIVIDUALSORGROUPS．THELEGALLIABILITYOFTHISSTATEMENTSHALLBEBORNEBYME．AUTHOR’SSIGNATURE∽斛／枷LL／翰棚UEDA㈦Ⅻ』留，6、午ASTATEMENTABOUTTHEUSEAUTHORIZATIONOFDISSERTATIONSIAGREETHATTHEUNIVERSITYRETAINSORSENDSTHEPRINTEDVERSIONANDELECTRONICVERSIONOFTHEPAPERTOTHERELEVANTSTATEDEPARTMENTORAGENCY，ALLOWINGTHEDISSERTATIONTOBEVIEWEDANDBORROWED；IAUTHORIZESHANDONGUNIVERSITYTOCOMPILEALLORPARTOFTHEDISSERTATIONINTORELEVANTDATABASESFORRETRIEVALANDUSEPHOTOCOPYING，INDENTATION，OROTHERMEANSOFCOPYINGTOSAVETHEPAPERANDCOMPILETHEDISSERTATION．AFTERDECRYPTINGCONFIDENTIALPAPERSSHOULDCOMPLYWITHTHISREQUIREMENTAUTHOR’SSIGNIII?？P弘【苔，舌．／乒

簡介：分類號D990密級公開||IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILJ0132539學校代碼學號I爭JC龍喜NORTHWESTUNIVERSITY學科名稱國際法學作者袁瑞燕指導老師劉雁冰副教授西北大學學位評定委員會二。一七年六月西北大學學位論文知識產權聲明書本人完全了解西北大學關于收集、保存、使用學位論文的規定。學校有權保留并向國家有關部門或機構送交論文的復印件和電子版。本人允許論文被查閱和借閱。本人授權西北大學可以將本學位論文的全部或部分內容編入有關數據庫進行檢索，可以采用影印、縮印或掃描等復制手段保存和匯編本學位論文。同時授權中國科學技術信息研究所等機構將本學位論文收錄到中國學位論文全文數據庫或其它相關數據庫。保密論文待解密后適用本聲明。學位論文作者簽名意瑞葛指導教師簽名＼衫L疥穆乃1年∥月孑日九門年∥月／日西北大學學位論文獨創性聲明本人聲明所呈交的學位論文是本人在導師指導下進行的研究工作及取得的研究成果。據我所知，除了文中特別加以標注和致謝的地方外，本論文不包含其他人已經發表或撰寫過的研究成果，也不包含為獲得西北大學或其它教育機構的學位或證書而使用過的材料。與我一同工作的同志對本研究所做的任何貢獻均已在論文中作了明確的說明并表示謝意。學位論文作者簽名囊旃蓼為廣7年鄉月∥日

簡介：上海交通大學博士學位論文憲法實施視點下海關緝私懲罰制度研究ASTUDYOFCUSTOMSANLLSMUGGLINGANDPENAITYFROMAPERSPECTTVEOFIⅧLEMENTATIONOFTHECONSTITUTL0N院系凱原法學院專業憲法學與行政法學姓名萬曙春指導教師童之偉教授完成日期2014年6月3日